This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, cjwatson, eric.araujo, lars.gustaebel, pitrou, python-dev, r.david.murray, terry.reedy
Date 2012-05-09.13:33:35
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1336570416.31.0.410198838399.issue13815@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Yeah, I know it is technically private.  We still tend to keep names around unless there's a good reason to delete them (like using them leads to broken code anyway).  The code search is some evidence this deletion would be OK, but why *not* follow Amaury's suggestion?

I'm OK if you reclose this, but I unfortunately I don't think simple cleanliness is a good argument (even though I would like it to be).  The other arguments are better :)
History
Date User Action Args
2012-05-09 13:33:36r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, barry, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, lars.gustaebel, pitrou, cjwatson, eric.araujo, python-dev
2012-05-09 13:33:36r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1336570416.31.0.410198838399.issue13815@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-05-09 13:33:35r.david.murraylinkissue13815 messages
2012-05-09 13:33:35r.david.murraycreate