Message160287
Yeah, I know it is technically private. We still tend to keep names around unless there's a good reason to delete them (like using them leads to broken code anyway). The code search is some evidence this deletion would be OK, but why *not* follow Amaury's suggestion?
I'm OK if you reclose this, but I unfortunately I don't think simple cleanliness is a good argument (even though I would like it to be). The other arguments are better :) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-05-09 13:33:36 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, barry, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, lars.gustaebel, pitrou, cjwatson, eric.araujo, python-dev |
2012-05-09 13:33:36 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1336570416.31.0.410198838399.issue13815@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-05-09 13:33:35 | r.david.murray | link | issue13815 messages |
2012-05-09 13:33:35 | r.david.murray | create | |
|