Message157827
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:32 PM, R. David Murray <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
> R. David Murray <rdmurray@bitdance.com> added the comment:
> I, on the other hand, would prefer if it were made part of the API contract that an
> error is raised, and to fix any stdlib implementations *of that API* that don't conform
> to that. (That is, locks from other modules may well not follow that API, and their
> documentation should cover their API.)
Do you consider it reasonable that all stdlib Locks follow that API,
and change to raise either RuntimeError or a subclass?
I don't feel comfortable declaring that (not even only for future
feature releases), but if you do, or Guido does, or ... etc ... I'll
submit patches for at least dummy_threading and logging.
-jJ |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-04-08 23:59:03 | Jim.Jewett | set | recipients:
+ Jim.Jewett, georg.brandl, pitrou, r.david.murray, sandro.tosi, docs@python, python-dev |
2012-04-08 23:59:03 | Jim.Jewett | link | issue14502 messages |
2012-04-08 23:59:03 | Jim.Jewett | create | |
|