Message157308
> I, for one, use both uncommitted-changes and named branches; the
> former is easiest, but the latter safer: if I screw up a merge in a
> clone where I use a named branch, I can revert and retry the merge,
> but if I screw up merging pulled changes with my uncommitted edits, I
> risk losing them.
I think uncommitted changes is fine for a simple introduction.
hg experts can use whatever they want without needing our help. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-04-01 16:01:14 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo |
2012-04-01 16:01:13 | pitrou | link | issue14466 messages |
2012-04-01 16:01:13 | pitrou | create | |
|