Author pitrou
Recipients elsdoerfer, eric.araujo, giampaolo.rodola, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, ubershmekel
Date 2012-04-01.12:20:43
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1333282537.3449.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <1333282486.34.0.300291546851.issue13968@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
> I found this comprehensive description of the '**' convention at
> http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/2809/Recursive-patterned-File-Globbing that can translate directly to unittests.
> 
> I'd like to fix the patch for these specs but should it be in a new
> rglob function or in the existing glob.glob()? I think it should be a
> new one to avoid any edge-case compatibility concerns even though on
> face value there shouldn't be any.

I think it should be the existing glob.glob(). We won't introduce a new
function any time we add a new syntactic feature in the glob
mini-language.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-04-01 12:20:44pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, rhettinger, ncoghlan, giampaolo.rodola, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, ubershmekel, elsdoerfer
2012-04-01 12:20:43pitroulinkissue13968 messages
2012-04-01 12:20:43pitroucreate