Message156955
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Hah, I've been dealing with Python's regression test suite for 8+ years and there are still cases where I don't understand the rationale for testing things a particular way (beyond "it must have seemed like a good idea at the time"). It has a lot more historical cruft than the standard library does :)
>
> The "proper" location for a particular test can be a bit of a coin toss in many cases, but one useful guide (which applies in this case) is to try to avoid adding *new* standard library dependencies to a test module if there's an alternate suitable location that already has those dependencies.
I just checked the patch and it still applies cleanly with the two
effected tests passing.
Nick, any chance of getting this checked in and closed? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-03-27 21:05:18 | ethan.furman | set | recipients:
+ ethan.furman, ncoghlan |
2012-03-27 21:05:17 | ethan.furman | link | issue14136 messages |
2012-03-27 21:05:16 | ethan.furman | create | |
|