Message 156921 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	r.david.murray
Recipients	ezyang, federico.reghenzani, r.david.murray
Date	2012-03-27.13:37:50
SpamBayes Score	2.7477973e-09
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1332855470.86.0.797622300087.issue14416@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Close. We either need to mention that LOG_AUTHPRIV is only defined if the platform defines it, or we need to change the implementation so that it is always defined (by mapping it to some other facility if it doesn't exist). I'm of mixed mind about it: the former makes some sense to me, but the module precedent is clearly intentionally the latter. In the absence of a good reason to do otherwise, I think we should follow the module precedent. Anyone else have an opinion?

Close.  We either need to mention that LOG_AUTHPRIV is only defined if the platform defines it, or we need to change the implementation so that it is always defined (by mapping it to some other facility if it doesn't exist).  I'm of mixed mind about it: the former makes some sense to me, but the module precedent is clearly intentionally the latter.

In the absence of a good reason to do otherwise, I think we should follow the module precedent.

Anyone else have an opinion?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-03-27 13:37:50	r.david.murray	set	recipients: + r.david.murray, ezyang, federico.reghenzani
2012-03-27 13:37:50	r.david.murray	set	messageid: <1332855470.86.0.797622300087.issue14416@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-03-27 13:37:50	r.david.murray	link	issue14416 messages
2012-03-27 13:37:50	r.david.murray	create