This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author eric.araujo
Recipients alexis, eric.araujo, paul.moore, t2y, tarek
Date 2012-03-13.01:15:56
SpamBayes Score 2.9511737e-10
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1331601358.95.0.594505967073.issue14002@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
[Paul]
> To what? The individual packages?
No, I meant distutils2 bugs.  I will open them when I get a minute.  You’re right that projects using metadata 1.0 or 1.1 don’t have to use a version conforming to PEP 386, and that packaging should warn when using the create and install actions and the check command, not when iterating over installed distributions.

[Tetsuya Morimoto]
> I made a patch which checks the "func_name" attribute of function before it refers. It
> works for me. However, I wonder if a function has both "func.im_self" and
> "func.func_name"? Tell me the background because I'm newbie for distutils2.
It’s not really a distutils2 detail but a general Python thing: functions and methods have these func_name (or __name__ in Python 3) attributes, and the somewhat complicated code in distutils2.pypi uses them to do its thing.  Alexis intends to clean up that code a bit and we’ll also need more tests.  If you’re new to distutils2, I think this bug is not easy or fun enough and you would have more luck working on another one.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-03-13 01:15:59eric.araujosetrecipients: + eric.araujo, paul.moore, tarek, alexis, t2y
2012-03-13 01:15:58eric.araujosetmessageid: <1331601358.95.0.594505967073.issue14002@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-03-13 01:15:58eric.araujolinkissue14002 messages
2012-03-13 01:15:56eric.araujocreate