Message150743
[copy/paste failure in my previous message, please disregard]
> One possible factor is that my .pypirc is symlinked from ~/.pypirc to config/python/.pypirc and
> it's conceivable that Python 3.2.0 has some issues with symlink resolution that caused it to not
> process the .pypirc properly.
Are these Windows symlinks? Are they supposed to be dereferenced transparently by the OS (i.e. during open) like unix symlinks?
> Sure enough. I just confirmed that with Python 3.2.0, if .pypirc is symlinked, distutils behaves
> as if the .pypirc isn't present at all, but if that same .pypirc is copied, it behaves as
> expected. If one deletes the .pypirc altogether, it produces the same error.
OK. For distutils2, I think we’ll want better logging/error reporting. The user should see “no /what/ever/.pypirc found”, not “section not found”.
> I suggest we mark this bug as resolved (as the primary cause was due to the file not being read at
> all), but also apply your patch (which has some other good fixes) without the CUSTOM_SERVER, or
> with a version of the CUSTOM_SERVER that works.
Agreed. I’ll resume work on that patch to understand why it fails. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-01-06 16:50:31 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, jaraco, tarek, alexis |
2012-01-06 16:50:31 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1325868631.73.0.746869465106.issue11473@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-01-06 16:50:31 | eric.araujo | link | issue11473 messages |
2012-01-06 16:50:31 | eric.araujo | create | |
|