Message148842
@Ron: Now that it has a reasonably clear signature, I could see my way clear to making the Instruction._disassemble() method public, which makes it easy for people to compose their own disassembly output.
For all the other display methods, I prefer Ryan Kelly's suggestion of supporting a "file" argument which is then passed through to the underlying "print()" calls.
This is inconsistent with what I originally did for the code_info() APIs (where I made a separate "give me the string" function), but it's the lowest impact change that avoids the need to capture stdout. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-12-04 07:46:56 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, loewis, rhettinger, jcea, belopolsky, ron_adam, alex, rfk, meador.inge, eric.snow |
2011-12-04 07:46:56 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1322984816.06.0.644104925994.issue11816@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-12-04 07:45:55 | ncoghlan | link | issue11816 messages |
2011-12-04 07:45:55 | ncoghlan | create | |
|