This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author collinwinter
Recipients alex, collinwinter, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, gregory_p, markonervo, petri.lehtinen, pitrou, rhettinger, serprex
Date 2011-11-20.03:56:20
SpamBayes Score 5.0429105e-12
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1321761381.12.0.638962852778.issue13430@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I assume I was added to this thread since I wrote the functional module, so I'll give my take in that capacity. IMO Python doesn't need a more general version of partial(); indeed, I question the need for partial() as it is today. Querying Google Code Search for code using partial, I haven't found any usages in the wild where partial() makes code more readable than simply defining a new function. partial() is almost always a loss for readability.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-11-20 03:56:21collinwintersetrecipients: + collinwinter, rhettinger, pitrou, gregory_p, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, alex, serprex, petri.lehtinen, markonervo
2011-11-20 03:56:21collinwintersetmessageid: <1321761381.12.0.638962852778.issue13430@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-11-20 03:56:20collinwinterlinkissue13430 messages
2011-11-20 03:56:20collinwintercreate