Message146966
> In this kind of situation, it is perfectly legitimate for the client
> to perform a half-duplex close (shutdown(SHUT_WR)), since it does
> not intend to send data (which is implied by the fact that the sever
> doesn't implement an handle_read() method).
> With the current code, the server will keep sending data until the
> remote end close()s its socket.
> With this patch, this would break: the server's handle_close()
> method will be called right away.
Since this patch may break existing valid code, I think it should be
closed as invalid. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-11-03 19:54:40 | xdegaye | set | recipients:
+ xdegaye, josiahcarlson, giampaolo.rodola, stutzbach, neologix |
2011-11-03 19:54:40 | xdegaye | set | messageid: <1320350080.89.0.878923744396.issue13311@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-11-03 19:54:40 | xdegaye | link | issue13311 messages |
2011-11-03 19:54:40 | xdegaye | create | |
|