This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ezio.melotti
Recipients eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, nailor, petri.lehtinen, sandro.tosi, terry.reedy
Date 2011-10-21.21:54:57
SpamBayes Score 1.4432627e-09
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1319234098.35.0.7439841106.issue12296@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
That's a bit heavy in my opinion.  I don't think it's necessary to define in detail what "backward-compatibile" means, it's probably enough to say that whatever code might be running before the patch should keep running fine even after.  Bug fixes can change the behavior -- but only if the current behavior is clearly wrong.

In addition you might want to define the meaning of "features", "bug fixes", and "security fixes", mention what releases accept what, say that doc fixes are usually fine in bug fix releases too, and possibly document the deprecation process.  But maybe this is getting out of the initial scope of the issue :)
History
Date User Action Args
2011-10-21 21:54:58ezio.melottisetrecipients: + ezio.melotti, terry.reedy, eric.araujo, sandro.tosi, nailor, petri.lehtinen
2011-10-21 21:54:58ezio.melottisetmessageid: <1319234098.35.0.7439841106.issue12296@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-10-21 21:54:57ezio.melottilinkissue12296 messages
2011-10-21 21:54:57ezio.melotticreate