Message145047
What follows is the original email from Nick.
--
We maintain two independent heads in hg: 2.7 and default
3.2 is open for general bugfixes
2.5 (IIRC), 2.6 and 3.1 are open for security fixes
Security fixes (if applicable to both heads) go:
2.5 -> 2.6 -> 2.7
3.1 -> 3.2 -> default
General bug fixes (if applicable to both heads) go:
2.7
3.2 -> default
New features are added to default only
The relative ordering of 2.x and 3.x changes doesn't really matter -
the important thing is not to merge them in *either* direction. I
think you can theoretically do cherry-picking with Hg, but most people
seem to just do independent commits to the two streams.
If the devguide doesn't align with the above, then a tracker issue
pointing that out would be handy :) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-10-06 22:46:56 | larry | set | recipients:
+ larry, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo |
2011-10-06 22:46:56 | larry | set | messageid: <1317941216.64.0.449797500696.issue13105@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-10-06 22:46:56 | larry | link | issue13105 messages |
2011-10-06 22:46:55 | larry | create | |
|