Message143308
> without-threads, it segfault:
>
It's normal :-)
_stack_overflow triggers - as it names implies - a stack overflow.
However, as you can see in the output, faulthandler is now able to
catch the SIGSEGV and display the backtrace (because it set up an
alternate stack for the signal handler with sigaltstack).
> However, if I run test_faulthandler.py, it seems to be ok:
Yes: the test checks that the stack overflow was correctly caught by
faulthandler.
@Victor: can I commit the patch? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-09-01 06:45:09 | neologix | set | recipients:
+ neologix, vstinner, rpointel |
2011-09-01 06:45:09 | neologix | link | issue12868 messages |
2011-09-01 06:45:09 | neologix | create | |
|