Message142065
>Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti@gmail.com> added the comment:
>On wide 3.2 it passes too, so the failure is limited to narrow builds (are =
>you sure that it fails on wide builds for you?).
You're right: my wide build is not Python3, just Python2. In fact,
it's even worse, because it's the stock build on Linux, which seems
on this machine to be 2.6 not 2.7.
I have private builds that are 2.7 and 3.2, but those are both narrow.
I do not have a 3.3 build. Should I?
I'm remembering why I removed Python2 from my Unicode talk, because
of how it made me pull my hair out. People at the talk wanted to know
what I meant, but I didn't have time to go into it. I think this
gets added to the hairpulling list.
--tom |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-08-14 16:57:17 | tchrist | set | recipients:
+ tchrist, rhettinger, terry.reedy, pitrou, jkloth, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett, Arfrever, r.david.murray |
2011-08-14 16:57:16 | tchrist | link | issue12749 messages |
2011-08-14 16:57:16 | tchrist | create | |
|