This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author eric.araujo
Recipients eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, louiscipher, terry.reedy
Date 2011-08-08.14:35:05
SpamBayes Score 1.5671521e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1312814105.91.0.579798295786.issue12301@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
instead of*

An addition: in some cases, it may be on purpose that someone used ``somename`` instead of :func:`somename`, for example to avoid a ton of link in the doc of the somename function.  For the most part however, I believe it was just unawareness (or maybe unavailability) of the :data: construct that explains its absence.

One last precision: markup like ``getattr(spam, ham)`` should stay untouched: it is a code snippet, not just a reference to the function.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-08-08 14:35:05eric.araujosetrecipients: + eric.araujo, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, ezio.melotti, louiscipher
2011-08-08 14:35:05eric.araujosetmessageid: <1312814105.91.0.579798295786.issue12301@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-08-08 14:35:05eric.araujolinkissue12301 messages
2011-08-08 14:35:05eric.araujocreate