This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author brandon-rhodes
Recipients belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, brandon-rhodes, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, pitrou, sandro.tosi
Date 2011-08-04.23:28:11
SpamBayes Score 1.3340239e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1312500492.23.0.973832864619.issue11572@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Ezio and Sandro, thank you very much for your attention to this issue, and for helping me split it into manageable chunks! To answer the question about why "coverage" does not show as high a total as it ought: it's because coverage normally can't see the outer, global scope execution of modules that are already imported by the time "coverage" itself can take control and install a tracer. I have another patch outstanding that fixes this — we are still working on it, but the code works fine — if you want to run "coverage" and see a more accurate number: http://bugs.python.org/issue11561
History
Date User Action Args
2011-08-04 23:28:12brandon-rhodessetrecipients: + brandon-rhodes, ncoghlan, belopolsky, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, daniel.urban, sandro.tosi
2011-08-04 23:28:12brandon-rhodessetmessageid: <1312500492.23.0.973832864619.issue11572@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-08-04 23:28:11brandon-rhodeslinkissue11572 messages
2011-08-04 23:28:11brandon-rhodescreate