This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author sandro.tosi
Recipients belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, brandon-rhodes, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, pitrou, sandro.tosi
Date 2011-08-04.22:30:00
SpamBayes Score 0.0012148973
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1312497001.08.0.993512629694.issue11572@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Hi Brandon, I really like to see your patch applied, let's see what I can do (I also added Ezio in the loop).

I think you only addressed half of msg132140 : could you please have a look at the first Éric's question?

Also, still Éric made a comment on rietveld (you'd access to it clicking on 'review' next to your patch) so it would be nice if you can reply to that too.

About the ~100% coverage, it's probably me but I can't get more then 67%:

$ ./python -m coverage run --pylib --source=copy Lib/test/regrtest.py test_copy
[1/1] test_copy
1 test OK.
$ ./python -m coverage report | grep copy
Lib/copy     182     60    67%

How did you compute the coverage?
History
Date User Action Args
2011-08-04 22:30:01sandro.tosisetrecipients: + sandro.tosi, ncoghlan, belopolsky, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, daniel.urban, brandon-rhodes
2011-08-04 22:30:01sandro.tosisetmessageid: <1312497001.08.0.993512629694.issue11572@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-08-04 22:30:00sandro.tosilinkissue11572 messages
2011-08-04 22:30:00sandro.tosicreate