Message139749
Thanks for correcting me. I guess I assumed that the "message" variable is
an HTTPMessage.
Is send_response documented somewhere? I failed to find a reference.
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Petri Lehtinen <report@bugs.python.org>wrote:
>
> Petri Lehtinen <petri@digip.org> added the comment:
>
> It seems to me that you're indeed misusing it.
>
> The correct way would be something like this (assuming response is a
> HTTPResponse object from httplib):
>
> self.send_response(response.status)
> for name, value in response.getheaders():
> self.send_header(name, value)
> self.end_headers()
>
> This is because send_response's second argument is the HTTP's "reason"
> field, i.e. invoking:
>
> self.send_response(123, 'FOOBAR')
>
> results in
>
> HTTP/1.1 123 FOOBAR\r\n
>
> to be sent, followed by "Server" and "Date" headers. The second argument is
> not meant to be used for sending headers.
>
> (When the second argument is omitted, a standard reason for the given
> status code is used.)
>
> ----------
> nosy: +petri.lehtinen
> resolution: -> invalid
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue12439>
> _______________________________________
> |
File name |
Uploaded |
unnamed
|
Yoav.Weiss,
2011-07-04.10:52:44
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-07-04 10:52:45 | Yoav.Weiss | set | recipients:
+ Yoav.Weiss, orsenthil, petri.lehtinen |
2011-07-04 10:52:44 | Yoav.Weiss | link | issue12439 messages |
2011-07-04 10:52:44 | Yoav.Weiss | create | |
|