Message139243
>> That would be incorrect for some systems. For example, FreeBSD does
>> change sets of symbolic constants across system releases (mostly
>> additions, but sometimes also removals). Back then, SunOS 4 and SunOS
>> 5 were completely unrelated systems.
>>
>
> Well, I don't see the problem in that case.
What I'm advocating is to special-case Linux (and any other system
where major version numbers don't mean much).
> The point I (and others) have been trying to make is that 99% of the
> time, people using sys.platform really mean platform.system() or
> uname[0], since they're only interested in the operating system, and
> don't care about the release. That's true of the vast majority of such
> occurrences in Lib/test, and probably true of the vast majority of the
> user code base.
I don't argue with that. I agree the code is broken (although I disagree
that platform.system is the right answer in most cases), but that
doesn't help resolving this issue (unless the resolution is "no change",
which I still oppose to).
> Furthermore, at least on Linux, the major version number doesn't mean
> anything
Indeed - hence I propose to drop it from sys.platform if the system
is Linux. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-06-27 08:05:05 | loewis | set | recipients:
+ loewis, lemburg, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, jwilk, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, neologix, rosslagerwall, petri.lehtinen |
2011-06-27 08:05:04 | loewis | link | issue12326 messages |
2011-06-27 08:05:04 | loewis | create | |
|