Message138110
> maybe there's some way to reuse unittest's assertEqual machinery?
Hum, I think the diff functionality is cleanly separated in a (private) method, so we could get diff for free.
> I also wonder if the whole environment-changed thing should be moved
> into unittest so it could wrap around individual test methods.
Yeah, I was thinking about a WatchfulTestRunner that would perform the same checks. It annoys me to have two diverging sets of features to run tests: either checks with regrtest, or failfast, discovery and granularity with unittest. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-06-10 16:56:23 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, michael.foord |
2011-06-10 16:56:23 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1307724983.43.0.0599783418108.issue12314@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-06-10 16:56:22 | eric.araujo | link | issue12314 messages |
2011-06-10 16:56:22 | eric.araujo | create | |
|