Message134975
I'm OK with that - I'd actually suggest explicitly *emitting* a warning when the error is suppressed under -bb, as Ezio is right that even tests should be keeping their bytes/str separation straight. I don't like completely suppressing warnings/errors when a user has explicitly requested them.
I'd also be OK with a filtering approach that coerced the handling to "default" rather than "ignore" (although that require a bit more work to keep unittest from acting as though -b was always set on the command line). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-05-02 14:12:08 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, vstinner, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, michael.foord |
2011-05-02 14:12:08 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1304345528.8.0.173874686509.issue11887@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-05-02 14:12:08 | ncoghlan | link | issue11887 messages |
2011-05-02 14:12:08 | ncoghlan | create | |
|