➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author quodlibetor
Recipients quodlibetor
Date 2011-04-15.05:04:06
SpamBayes Score 8.836305e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1302843847.91.0.747010170012.issue11848@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
The comment just before the random.betavariate method reads in part:

## See
## http://sourceforge.net/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=130030&group_id=5470
## for Ivan Frohne's insightful analysis of why the original implementation:
## (snip original implementation) was dead wrong, and how it propbably got that way.

And I would like to read that comment, but the buglink is pretty deeply dead. I'm not sure what the correct thing to do here is, maybe stick the text of the bug into the comment, or just update the link.

But I'm definitely curious. Thanks.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-04-15 05:04:07quodlibetorsetrecipients: + quodlibetor
2011-04-15 05:04:07quodlibetorsetmessageid: <1302843847.91.0.747010170012.issue11848@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-04-15 05:04:07quodlibetorlinkissue11848 messages
2011-04-15 05:04:06quodlibetorcreate