Message133699
Yes, putting the function in _parseaddr is fine. And yes, 232 looks like a good place. The alternative would be understanding the rfc822 parser, which is pretty mind bending, and of doubtful additional benefit. (At most it would save a pair of split/join calls.) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-04-13 22:02:23 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, sdaoden, torsten.becker |
2011-04-13 22:02:22 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1302732142.93.0.537615932331.issue11783@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-04-13 22:02:22 | r.david.murray | link | issue11783 messages |
2011-04-13 22:02:22 | r.david.murray | create | |
|