Message133191
I thought about a warning, but the problem is that a subclass using the concrete API as part of its *implementation* of the associated slot or method is actually perfectly correct usage.
I'm not sure this is enough to give up on the idea of OrderedDict being a dict subclass implemented in C, though. It seems to me that some defensive internal checks (to pick up state corruption due to this problem) would be a lesser evil than giving up on being a dict subclass. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-04-07 04:50:19 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, rhettinger, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, Trundle, daniel.urban, docs@python |
2011-04-07 04:50:19 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1302151819.09.0.724675886969.issue10977@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-04-07 04:50:18 | ncoghlan | link | issue10977 messages |
2011-04-07 04:50:18 | ncoghlan | create | |
|