Author pitrou
Recipients Albert.Strasheim, aljungberg, asksol, bquinlan, gdb, haypo, hongqn, jnoller, pitrou, vlasovskikh
Date 2011-03-31.12:25:37
SpamBayes Score 1.60983e-06
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1301574338.12.0.437023762009.issue9205@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
The problem with this approach is that it won't help concurrent.futures.
Detection of killed endpoints should ideally happen at a lower level, e.g. in Process or Queue or Connection objects.

Speaking of which, I wonder why we have both multiprocessing.Pool and concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor. They seem to fill the exact same needs, with different APIs...
History
Date User Action Args
2011-03-31 12:25:38pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, bquinlan, haypo, jnoller, hongqn, asksol, vlasovskikh, gdb, Albert.Strasheim, aljungberg
2011-03-31 12:25:38pitrousetmessageid: <1301574338.12.0.437023762009.issue9205@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-03-31 12:25:37pitroulinkissue9205 messages
2011-03-31 12:25:37pitroucreate