This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author erik.bray
Recipients alexis, eric.araujo, erik.bray, tarek
Date 2011-03-21.14:44:50
SpamBayes Score 2.617439e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1300718691.38.0.572585618063.issue11595@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I've got an additional patch to this function that also adds support for the package_data option, for extension modules (at least as they are currently specified in setup.cfg), and adds support for running setup_hook.

The only problem is that it's starting to copy more and more from distutils2.config.Config.  The difference being that it's still simpler, and doesn't depend on much else from distutils2.  The reason being that I'm using this in my own packages so that I can distutils2-like setup.cfgs, but still install with normal distutils and/or Distribute without depending on distutils2 in its entirety.

I'm wondering if there might be a better way to proceed, or if this sort of compatibility support is even useful to anyone else.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-03-21 14:44:51erik.braysetrecipients: + erik.bray, tarek, eric.araujo, alexis
2011-03-21 14:44:51erik.braysetmessageid: <1300718691.38.0.572585618063.issue11595@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-03-21 14:44:50erik.braylinkissue11595 messages
2011-03-21 14:44:50erik.braycreate