Message131434
Nick Coghlan <report@bugs.python.org> writes:
> Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> Regarding "__reduce__", other readers will have the same question Éric
> did, so that point should definitely go in a comment after the
> "__reduce_ex__" check.
I had initially wanted to make a comment, but feared the objection that
a comment would eventually fall out of sync with the implementation of
object.__reduce_ex__ over the years (just as copy.py currently has all
sorts of cruft that is no longer applicable). But I think that you are
right that a comment that's at least true today is better than no
comment at all; so I will add one on Monday. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-03-19 18:18:32 | brandon-rhodes | set | recipients:
+ brandon-rhodes, ncoghlan, belopolsky, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, daniel.urban |
2011-03-19 18:18:32 | brandon-rhodes | link | issue11572 messages |
2011-03-19 18:18:32 | brandon-rhodes | create | |
|