Message127818
> Hmm, ok, but AFAICT, your patch was rejected rather because of the way
> it approached the problem, not so much because of the issue itself.
I would be rather for the patch myself. The bytecode currently generated
for sliced indexing is awfully suboptimal.
> Plus, the fact that Python 3 requires slices in more places than
> Python 2 (which had the lower level getslice protocol) makes this a
> bigger issue now than it was three years ago.
True. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-02-03 20:20:16 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, belopolsky, scoder |
2011-02-03 20:20:16 | pitrou | link | issue11107 messages |
2011-02-03 20:20:16 | pitrou | create | |
|