Message126538
> OK. So he is saying that when the spec says "an object of type str" he
> means 'type(x) is str' as opposed to 'isinstance(x, str)'. I would
> naively have expected the latter, as other people clearly do as well.
+1 with RDM here.
> Doesn't matter how unpythonic it is: the spec calls for exact types
Can you clarify why it does? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2011-01-19 16:52:53 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, pje, ods, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, riffm |
2011-01-19 16:52:53 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1295455973.84.0.301286307596.issue10935@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2011-01-19 16:52:33 | pitrou | link | issue10935 messages |
2011-01-19 16:52:33 | pitrou | create | |
|