➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author belopolsky
Recipients belopolsky, docs@python, georg.brandl, napik, techtonik
Date 2011-01-11.21:27:23
SpamBayes Score 1.8451859e-09
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <AANLkTikYbXX+pm=PRZBRJZkb02kh-2oqvPpFnR2aXF5F@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <AANLkTi=t2548FPZQQTYbyyxWGJdoeB4EmYR9Esu=tuea@mail.gmail.com>
Content 
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:15 PM, anatoly techtonik
<report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
..
> To summarize: What is wrong with my previous proposal if we remove t
> from params?

Not much is wrong with it.   If it would come in a form of a patch and
without typos or mark-up mistakes, I or another committer would
probably apply it as an incremental improvement.   However, given that
additional effort is needed to apply your suggestion, I would rather
wait until a better solution is available.  Specifically, I don like
the duplication of time.localtime().tm_isdst recipe in daylight and
altzone.  Also, these variables should really be grouped together in
the docs.   I would like this to be done before a committer spends
time proofreading, fixing reST markup and committing the change.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-01-11 21:27:26belopolskysetrecipients: + belopolsky, georg.brandl, techtonik, napik, docs@python
2011-01-11 21:27:23belopolskylinkissue7229 messages
2011-01-11 21:27:23belopolskycreate