This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ron_adam
Recipients belopolsky, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, lukasz.langa, rhettinger, ron_adam
Date 2011-01-02.22:19:51
SpamBayes Score 8.9416013e-10
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1294006852.39.0.763747915098.issue10716@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> If the colors are passed directly to the HTML they should be
> removed >and left to the CSS(s) only. I don't know the code
> well enough to say if this is doable and/or if it requires a
> deprecation first;

We may have to do dome depreciating when it comes to the old HTMLDoc class methods.  Would it be possible to depreciate the whole class instead of the separate methods?  If so, it would be good if we can squeeze that into 3.2. <hint hint>  Or else we may not be able to finish this until Python 3.4.

The empty css elements will be used later.

Here is the css_v3.diff for review.  I'd like to hear any thoughts about the general html structure and class/id names.

Beside validating them, I test with firefox and chromium. I don't have easy access to ms-explorer or the current mac browser.
History
Date User Action Args
2011-01-02 22:20:52ron_adamsetrecipients: + ron_adam, georg.brandl, rhettinger, belopolsky, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, lukasz.langa
2011-01-02 22:20:52ron_adamsetmessageid: <1294006852.39.0.763747915098.issue10716@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2011-01-02 22:19:52ron_adamlinkissue10716 messages
2011-01-02 22:19:52ron_adamcreate