Message124135
Thanks for the patch. First, there's no need to use multiprocessing here. Threading would be sufficient. Second, you shouldn't use an explicit port number, but instead let the server bind itself to whatever port is available (I think 0 using as the port number achieves that). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-12-16 15:29:30 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, rosslagerwall |
2010-12-16 15:29:30 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1292513370.45.0.6896495473.issue10714@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-12-16 15:29:28 | pitrou | link | issue10714 messages |
2010-12-16 15:29:28 | pitrou | create | |
|