Message122759
I think it is definitely wrong the way it works in 3.x. (Especially since it works as expected in 2.x.)
I agree with Inyeol's preference of fixes: (1) make it work properly for listcomps as well as genexps, (2) if that's not possible, forbid yield in a genexp or listcomp.
Note that even though yield in a genexp could be considered as having a well-defined meaning, that meaning is not useful and I would consider it as merely a coincidence of the specification, not an intentional effect. So I would be fine changing its meaning. (My assumption is that since it is not useful there is -- almost -- no code depending on that meaning.) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-11-29 03:13:56 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, georg.brandl, rhettinger, benjamin.peterson, Inyeol.Lee |
2010-11-29 03:13:56 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1291000436.7.0.985183682766.issue10544@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-11-29 03:13:53 | gvanrossum | link | issue10544 messages |
2010-11-29 03:13:53 | gvanrossum | create | |
|