Message120279
> Unless I'm mistaken, Content-Type should only apply to the body, not the
> headers. Either the headers use UTF-8 (RFC 3977), or they should be
> MIME-encoded. Everything else is undecodable.
Yes, of course. Such articles are not RFC-compliant. You're not mistaken when you mention that the Content-Type: header field applies to the body.
I was just answering about how the encoding could be guessed. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-11-02 22:56:23 | jelie | set | recipients:
+ jelie, pitrou, eric.araujo, r.david.murray |
2010-11-02 22:56:23 | jelie | set | messageid: <1288738583.25.0.147008491692.issue10284@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-11-02 22:56:21 | jelie | link | issue10284 messages |
2010-11-02 22:56:21 | jelie | create | |
|