Message118994
The patch does not address that "unsigned long" is still used to calculate the hash values. This breaks numeric hashing and leads to incorrect values.
Python 3.2a3+ (py3k, Oct 17 2010, 19:03:38) [MSC v.1500 64 bit (AMD64)] on win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import sys
>>> sys.hash_info
sys.hash_info(width=64, modulus=-1, inf=314159, nan=0, imag=1000003)
>>>
Would "size_t" be the appropriate type to use? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-10-18 02:43:27 | casevh | set | recipients:
+ casevh, tim.peters, loewis, skip.montanaro, georg.brandl, rhettinger, jimjjewett, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, pitrou, ked-tao, benjamin.peterson |
2010-10-18 02:43:27 | casevh | set | messageid: <1287369807.57.0.453380548612.issue9778@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-10-18 02:43:26 | casevh | link | issue9778 messages |
2010-10-18 02:43:25 | casevh | create | |
|