This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients ggenellina, guettli, hoffman, news1234, pakal, r.david.murray, vinay.sajip, ysj.ray
Date 2010-10-09.14:56:08
SpamBayes Score 9.462209e-12
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1286636172.44.0.82156489121.issue1553375@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Pascal: my question exactly.  The question is whether the code is accurately reflecting the state of the python stack at exception time (which it seems like it ought to), in which case I don't understand how Python handles the chained exception, or it doesn't, in which case (more likely) I'm not understanding how the stack frame is put together.

Vinay: so in your run the subprocess call is not producing the final 'exception detail' line...it looks like the last line of the output from subprocess is getting lost.  I've updated the patch to add a p.wait() before the assert...can you see if that fixes it?  I also fixed the doc nit, thanks.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-10-09 14:56:13r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, vinay.sajip, guettli, hoffman, ggenellina, pakal, news1234, ysj.ray
2010-10-09 14:56:12r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1286636172.44.0.82156489121.issue1553375@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-10-09 14:56:10r.david.murraylinkissue1553375 messages
2010-10-09 14:56:10r.david.murraycreate