Message 115782 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	gvanrossum
Recipients	gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pitrou
Date	2010-09-07.15:46:55
SpamBayes Score	0.00014636743
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1283874416.49.0.75140900093.issue9757@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Given this explanation, of course I am +1 on an explicit release() method. But I'm still skeptical that a context manager adds much (not sure if that counts as -0 or +0 :-). I suppose after release() is called all accesses through the memoryview object should be invalid, right? Is this not covered by PEP 3118 at all?

Given this explanation, of course I am +1 on an explicit release() method.  But I'm still skeptical that a context manager adds much (not sure if that counts as -0 or +0 :-).

I suppose after release() is called all accesses through the memoryview object should be invalid, right?  Is this not covered by PEP 3118 at all?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-09-07 15:46:56	gvanrossum	set	recipients: + gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pitrou
2010-09-07 15:46:56	gvanrossum	set	messageid: <1283874416.49.0.75140900093.issue9757@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-09-07 15:46:55	gvanrossum	link	issue9757 messages
2010-09-07 15:46:55	gvanrossum	create