Message115431
I set to "pending" and "wontfix" to indicate what my proposed resolution was, and to await feedback - sorry for the misunderstanding.
The custom levels feature is not intended to be used casually (as it will cause unpredictable behaviour when used differently in different third-party libraries), but there are less common application-level scenarios (where logging interoperability is less of an issue) where custom levels might be needed - which is why they are provided.
It seems acceptable to me to have different conventions for third-party code and application code. For example, NullHandler is recommended for use with third-party libraries but is not especially useful for applications.
Configuration is not intended to *completely* cover the programmatic API - just to make it easier to do the most commonly-required things. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-09-03 10:10:07 | vinay.sajip | set | recipients:
+ vinay.sajip, tarek, eric.araujo |
2010-09-03 10:10:07 | vinay.sajip | set | messageid: <1283508607.12.0.667987504071.issue9576@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-09-03 10:10:05 | vinay.sajip | link | issue9576 messages |
2010-09-03 10:10:04 | vinay.sajip | create | |
|