➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients BreamoreBoy, ajaksu2, eric.araujo, jfinkels, l0nwlf, mnot, r.david.murray
Date 2010-08-24.02:07:10
SpamBayes Score 4.3693664e-05
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1282615632.85.0.83180513895.issue1194222@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Thanks for working on this.

I would prefer to have two patches: one that fixes the bug (and adds the unit tests) and a separate one for the cleanups (in a new issue).

I agree that the fact that it isn't complying with the RFC makes it a bug.  It seems unlikely that fixing this would break anyone's code, since if they are already working around the bug the return of a four digit year should cause their workaround code to be skipped.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-08-24 02:07:13r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, mnot, ajaksu2, eric.araujo, l0nwlf, jfinkels, BreamoreBoy
2010-08-24 02:07:12r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1282615632.85.0.83180513895.issue1194222@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-08-24 02:07:11r.david.murraylinkissue1194222 messages
2010-08-24 02:07:10r.david.murraycreate