Message114645
The generalist in me is inclined to suggest a "depth" parameter (with depth=1 equivalent to direct dependencies only, and depth = None meaning all dependencies), but I must admit I don't have a concrete use case for the extra generality. So the simpler, recurse/don't recurse approach is probably a better option (building a depth-limited search on top of the recursion flag wouldn't be difficult anyway).
Aside from missing docs and unit test updates, the idea seems sound. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-08-22 08:42:20 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, nnorwitz, brett.cannon, theller, jvr, misc_from_metz, eric.araujo, BreamoreBoy |
2010-08-22 08:42:20 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1282466540.01.0.498004661299.issue1284670@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-08-22 08:42:18 | ncoghlan | link | issue1284670 messages |
2010-08-22 08:42:17 | ncoghlan | create | |
|