This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author mark.dickinson
Recipients cvrebert, mark.dickinson, terry.reedy, ubershmekel
Date 2010-08-09.18:45:24
SpamBayes Score 1.4435369e-07
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1281379526.3.0.485478005876.issue6783@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
In fact, PEP 3003 says explicitly, under "Case-by-Case Exemptions":

"""
New methods on built-ins

    The case for adding a method to a built-in object can be made.
"""

So I'm changing the version back to 3.2.  Having said that, I'm still -0 on this change.  I can see some (small) value for bases 36 and 62 in particular, but little use for the other bases.

Incidentally, Yuvgoog Greenle did bring this up on the python-ideas list (thank you!).  The thread starts here:

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2009-August/005611.html

The thread was rather inconclusive:  it got bogged down in discussions over whether bases 37+ should be allowed, whether there should be options to specify the digit-set used, and the like.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-08-09 18:45:26mark.dickinsonsetrecipients: + mark.dickinson, terry.reedy, cvrebert, ubershmekel
2010-08-09 18:45:26mark.dickinsonsetmessageid: <1281379526.3.0.485478005876.issue6783@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-08-09 18:45:25mark.dickinsonlinkissue6783 messages
2010-08-09 18:45:24mark.dickinsoncreate