Message 113423 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	terry.reedy
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, docs@python, georg.brandl, llimllib, terry.reedy
Date	2010-08-09.16:19:43
SpamBayes Score	0.017256511
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1281370785.25.0.930624058339.issue6678@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Benjamin: Previously, .currentframe() == sys._getframe() == sys._getframe(0) but you redefined it as sys._getframe(1), which is a change in semantics. Is this intentional (ie, was it buggy before)? William: Benjamin's point was that the bug was not the doc but the implementation of .currentframe, so we were making the wrong fix relative to the intention of .currentframe.

Benjamin: Previously, .currentframe() == sys._getframe() == sys._getframe(0) but you redefined it as sys._getframe(1), which is a change in semantics. Is this intentional (ie, was it buggy before)?

William: Benjamin's point was that the bug was not the doc but the implementation of .currentframe, so we were making the wrong fix relative to the intention of .currentframe.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2010-08-09 16:19:45	terry.reedy	set	recipients: + terry.reedy, georg.brandl, benjamin.peterson, llimllib, docs@python
2010-08-09 16:19:45	terry.reedy	set	messageid: <1281370785.25.0.930624058339.issue6678@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-08-09 16:19:44	terry.reedy	link	issue6678 messages
2010-08-09 16:19:43	terry.reedy	create