This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author terry.reedy
Recipients loewis, t-kamiya, terry.reedy
Date 2010-07-09.05:19:00
SpamBayes Score 0.041060004
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1278652742.95.0.734030796127.issue5778@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
msc is the same in 3.1. How about gcc?
If still different, what change are you proposing?
add \n to one or delete it from other?

I agree that this is a (minor) unfortunate difference, but ...
Changing either would be a pitfall to developers who only use one or the other and have adapted to what they get. Those on both have probably learned to work with the difference. However, unless they do something like sys.version.strip(), they might have code invalidated too.

Of course, future developers might benefit.
History
Date User Action Args
2010-07-09 05:19:03terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, loewis, t-kamiya
2010-07-09 05:19:02terry.reedysetmessageid: <1278652742.95.0.734030796127.issue5778@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2010-07-09 05:19:01terry.reedylinkissue5778 messages
2010-07-09 05:19:00terry.reedycreate