Message108990
http://pastie.org/1025197
Is it deemed acceptable that setting up one's own SIGCHLD handler breaks communicate()?
I did not find it in the documentation.
With the above workaround one can mix communicate() processes with processes spawned in the background that one's too lazy to wait for. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-06-30 15:54:57 | zarkdav | set | recipients:
+ zarkdav |
2010-06-30 15:54:57 | zarkdav | set | messageid: <1277913297.34.0.963310724242.issue9127@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-06-30 15:54:55 | zarkdav | link | issue9127 messages |
2010-06-30 15:54:54 | zarkdav | create | |
|