Message108588
Thanks for bringing this up.
I think you have more work to do to successfully make the case that L.insert(0, x) is "difficult" enough to merit the addition of a new list method. There are already at least two in-place insert-at-front list APIs (the second being L[:0] = [x]). There should be a very compelling reason for adding a third, and I don't think that being able to skip the extra 0 in the L.insert version is going to suffice. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-06-25 12:10:37 | exarkun | set | recipients:
+ exarkun, andybuckley |
2010-06-25 12:10:36 | exarkun | set | messageid: <1277467836.9.0.707052807313.issue9080@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-06-25 12:10:35 | exarkun | link | issue9080 messages |
2010-06-25 12:10:34 | exarkun | create | |
|