Message108477
> As for Hg support, enough people seem to run mq on top of svn to make
> this a reasonable thing to add now and to change once the transition
> occurs.
Yes, but the question is what workflow it should assume. If you are
running mq for example (or pbranch, or doing local named branches),
using a simple "hg status" of the working copy will not do the right
thing.
(and, by the way, you can't assume mq is the favourite workflow out of
there: I for example use clones + local named branches instead) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-06-23 19:23:30 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, brett.cannon, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, eric.araujo |
2010-06-23 19:23:28 | pitrou | link | issue8999 messages |
2010-06-23 19:23:27 | pitrou | create | |
|