Message108092
> I would suggest that we focus on defining and building a
> lower-level interface along the lines of the PEP noted earlier,
> integrating that with evpy, and getting it in shape to go into the
> stdlib.
That sounds reasonable to me.
(although I would be also content with the lower-level interface
alone :-))
> If somebody does, then perhaps a four-tiered
> model makes more sense, with the bottom one being the raw wrappers
> around the various libs, the second from the bottom being
> compatibility shims, and the top two matching the other proposal.
That sounds much too complicated. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-06-18 09:37:32 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, loewis, gregory.p.smith, exarkun, giampaolo.rodola, gdamjan, heikki, eric.araujo, debatem1, daniel.urban, mcrute, jsamuel |
2010-06-18 09:37:30 | pitrou | link | issue8998 messages |
2010-06-18 09:37:30 | pitrou | create | |
|