Message106004
I don't think the set methods can make assumptions about whether instances of the Set API can be made frozen. It is okay to restrict this to just instances of "set" where we know its internal structure and know that its elements are hashable (see the collections docs for an example of a non-hashable set).
Also, the collections.Set methods are supposed to be minimal. They are not intended to mimic every aspect of regular set objects. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-05-18 19:50:54 | rhettinger | set | recipients:
+ rhettinger, stutzbach |
2010-05-18 19:50:53 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1274212253.92.0.600619819561.issue8752@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2010-05-18 19:50:52 | rhettinger | link | issue8752 messages |
2010-05-18 19:50:52 | rhettinger | create | |
|