Message104124
2010/4/24 Barry A. Warsaw <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
> Barry A. Warsaw <barry@python.org> added the comment:
>
> Removing __future__ as part of explicit command line execution of 2to3 makes some sense, but I wonder if 2to3 is used more often automatically (e.g. via Distribute) where it's at best unhelpful. 2to3 is all about making it easy to port code from Python 2 to 3, and this particular transformation makes it (albeit, slightly so) harder.
It's also designed to be easily customizable.
>
> A different idea would be to add a comment before the future import indicating its uselessness, but not removing it. OTOH, I would also be happy with a better way to just disable it in a setup.py (e.g. by passing the -x flag in somehow).
I'm not sure we should get into the habit of telling people that their
code is useless. :)
I'll just close this as won't fix. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2010-04-24 19:29:28 | benjamin.peterson | set | recipients:
+ benjamin.peterson, barry, eric.araujo |
2010-04-24 19:29:26 | benjamin.peterson | link | issue8505 messages |
2010-04-24 19:29:26 | benjamin.peterson | create | |
|